A picture of four small children in a row
monitoring/evaluation gifMonitoring/Evaluation Title gif AHRQ User Liaison Program
  Skip Navigation | Home Monitoring/Eval.  Choice of Quality Mgt. Strategy pt. 3 of 3

previous page Previous  -  Next next page

top of nav bar

Target Population Link Outreach Enrollment link Benefit Design and Service Delivery link Cost Sharing Link Crowd Out Link Monitoring and Evaluation link
Space saver image Site map link link legend link questions and comments acronyms list workshop materials link how to use this site link

Characteristics of the Quality Measures

A final consideration in choosing a quality measurement strategy is the characteristics of the quality measures themselves. These are as important as the State-specific characteristics. Characteristics that should be considered include:

  • Relevance. Is it a meaningful measure that identifies potential for improvements?
  • Scientific soundness. Is it a scientifically valid, accurate, and reproducible measure? Is there clinical evidence to support its use? Can it provide a process-outcome link?
  • Feasibility. Is it fiscally and logistically workable? Can it be precisely specified and conducted within confidentiality parameters? Is it auditable?
  • Comprehensiveness. How extensive is the information yielded through the measure?

Related Questions

Give me an overall context

Show me other SCHIP Workshop presenter-suggested strategies

Show me some lessons learned

What led to this?

Who presented this material?

arrow up